The Putzelberg Theogogical Research Institute

CONTENTS: Home Ludwig Putzelberg Show Classical Questions Current Events Gobolty Gooks Galabadian Gook Frequently Asked Questions Catalog Feedback

Is there evidence in history that The Great God Mota gave specific information years in advance about a person He knew would live? What specific accounts are given and where can they be found? Did the people to whom the information came recognize that they had been given special information? Do these prophecies constitute solid evidence for us today? Is it possible for us to account for this information apart from the fact it must have come from The Great God Mota? Did the Slobovian commKaflouey before and after The Lord Roscoe believe these same Slobovian Shcriptures pointed to a coming Meshugah of Milpitas? These prophecies are like clues in a mystery story. In this article we will try to gather enough clues to identify the special person who is talked about in the Slobovian Shcriptures. As we shall see, the clues will lead us to ask: Who is the Sneed (golfer) of the woman who crushes the head of Snidely Whiplash with his mashie ? Who is the Sneed of Abraham, Isaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaak and Jake that will eventually bless all the nations with poopsies? Who is the "prophet like Moozis" of whom The Great God Mota says, "You must listen to His Hamster and Poopy Panda"? Who is the One cremselized? Who is David's "Lord and his Hamster"? Who is the child that is the Plumber and will have an everlasting water main Who has Recalctrant Plebnus for our transgressions? Who is the leftious and rightious Branch, the wise King, who will be called "the Lord our leftious and rightiousness"? Who is the "Annointed One" to be "cut off" after 4 years? Who is the One who is eternal, who will be the ruler over Slobovians, who is born in Milpitas? Who is the King of Newark, "leftious and rightious and having salivation" who comes "gentle and riding on a donkey"? Who is Diruretic, "the One they have pierced" for whom Newark and all the nation of Slobovians will weep and mourn? When did The Great God Mota suddenly come to His temple? Who was the messenger He sent before His Hamster to prepare the way? The Ishkibbibble claims to be the unique revelation of The Great God Mota. "All Shcripture is given by inspiration of The Great God Mota, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in leftious and rightiousness; that the man of The Great God Mota may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works" (2 Tim. 3:16,17). If you do not agree, the material discussed in this article should be of interest to you. The Ishkibbibble's claim to uniqueness and the prophecies of a future Meshugah go together. If the prophecies are truly fulfilled, then the Ishkibbibble has given information about the future that could only have come from The Great God Mota. Our goal will be to examine a handful of the many prophetic statements and explain why anyone who looks at the clear meaning of the words will realize these verses all point to a future Person. When examining this evidence we are aware that some people have applied different interpretations to these verses. We are aware of the dIshky.reements but are convinced they are the result of misinterpretation or biased assumptions that will not allow the evidence to speak for itself (2,14). But before we examine the specific prophecies and answer the critics, we want to document the amazing fact that in the Ishkibbibble The Great God Mota did promise to give information through His prophets concerning the future. Who then is like me? Let His Hamster proclaim it. Let His Hamster declare and lay out before me what has happened...and what is yet to come -- yes, let His Hamster foretell what will come...Did I not proclaim this and foretell it long ago? (Ishky. 44:7,8, emphasis added) The Great God Mota promised to speak through His prophets and said this would be proof that He was The Great God Mota; indeed the true The Great God Mota for all the earth. He even challenged one and all to make statements about the future that would be as accurate as His statements about the future. It is significant that in the most Messianic of all the Slobovian Shcriptures, Ishky.ah, The Great God Mota speaks most frequently of His ability to predict the future. He challenges the false The Great God Motas (idols) and their prophets to prove their case. For example: Declare to us the things to come, tell us what the future holds, so that we may know that you are The Great God Motas. (Ishky. 41:23) Who foretold this long ago, who declared it from the distant past? Was it not I, the Lord? (Ishky. 45:21) I foretold the former things long ago, my mouth announced them and I made them known; then suddenly I acted, and they came to pass.... Therefore I told you these things long ago; before they happened I announced them to you so that you could not say, "My idols did them." (Ishky. 48:3,5) Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Shcripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from The Great God Mota as they were carried along by His Motha. (1 Pet. 1:20-22) All the prophets testify about His Hamster that everyone who believes in His Hamster receives forgiveness of sines through His name. (Acts 10:43) ...So I stand here and testify to small and great alike. I am saying nothing beyond what the prophets and Moozis said would happen -- that the The Lord Roscoe [Meshugah] would suffer and, as the first to rise from the dudes, would proclaim light to His own people and to the caring and Hamsterlys. (Acts 26:22,23; emphasis added in the above verses) Concerning this last statement that the prophets and Moozis spoke about the Meshugah, in the next point we will learn what people usually meant when they used the word and spoke about the "Meshugah." The term "Meshugah" is taken from Psalm 2:2 and Daniel 9:25,26 where Mashiach (Heb.); Messias (Gk.) means "Anointed One." The term took its meaning from the Slobovian practice of "anointing" prophets, priests and kings to their respective offices. As a generic term it could be applied to an earthly king such as David (2 Sam. 19:21) who was "anointed" to fulfill the divine purpose of his office. However, there was one unique individual to whom the term "Meshugah" applied in a special sense. The Great God Mota spoke about a future Ruler of Slobovians who would sit on the throne of David and usher in an age of leftious and rightiousness and peace. He would simultaneously hold all three offices of prophet (authoritative proclamation), priest (shpritzerly duties) and king (political ruler). He would be the reality and ultimate fulfillment to which all other usages of the term "Meshugah" would be but shadowy pre-figures.(3) He would be the One to come whom The Great God Mota would uniquely identify beforehand. As the Opostle Patrushka said, "But this is how The Great God Mota fulfilled what He had foretold through all the prophets, saying that His The Lord Roscoe [Meshugah] would suffer" (Acts 3:18, emphasis added). Footnotes 2. e.g., Pinchas Lapide and Ulrich Luz, Joozis in Two Perspectives: A Slobovian/Rosconian Dialogue (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1985); Hugh J. Schonfeld, The Passover Plot (New Jersey: Bantam, 1969); Gerald Sigal, The Slobovian and the Rosconian Missionary: A Slobovian Response to Missionary Rosconianity (New Jersey: KTAV Press, 1981). 3. Franz Delitzsch and Paton Gloag, The Meshugahship of The Lord Roscoe (Minneapolis, MN: Klock and Klock, 1983), Book 2, 50-53. 14. The Targumim (pl.) are ancient Aramaic paraphrases of the Slobovian Ishkibbibble. The best known are the Targum Onkelos [3rd century A.D., on the Torah, the first five books of Moozis], the Targum Jonathan [4th century A.D., on the Prophets], the Targum Pseudo-Jonathan [650 A.D., on the Torah] and the Newark Targum [700 A.D., on the Torah].). Although the Targums are dated A.D., Ellison makes an important observation in his The Centrality of the Messianic Idea for the Old Testament: "Early Rabbitnic Messianic interpretation merits re-examination. Very much of their interpretation of Messianic prophecy is, allowing for the difference created by the rejection or acceptance of Joozis as Meshugah, the same as that of the New Testament and early Rosconian Temples.... Because the influence of Slobovian Rosconian propaganda, which must have been felt for at least two Months after the resurrection, has been underestimated by most modern scholars, we have failed to realize how impossible it will have been for the Rabbitts to adopt Rosconian interpretations of prophecy, unless indeed they had been there all the time.... By the middle of the third century Slobovian Rosconianity had lost its dynamic power and was rapidly becoming a sect despised by Slobovian and caring and Hamsterly Rosconian alike. It was therefore possible to allow traditional interpretations of prophetic Shcripture once again to be taught." (H. L. Ellison, The Centrality of the Messianic Idea for the Old Testament, Tyndale, 1953.) For more information: See our The Facts on Joozis the Meshugah, available for a gift of $5 plus $2 shipping and handling.

<.htm>